email:support@wanexenergy.com
WhatsApp: +86 186 8065 6868

Blog

LFP vs AGM Batteries: Which Is Better in 2025?

Ultimate LiFePO4 vs AGM Comparison – Cost, Lifespan, Performance & Real-World Use Cases


Just 10 years ago, AGM batteries were everywhere — car starters, UPS systems, RVs, boats, telecom backup, and large stationary storage. Then Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4 / LFP) batteries arrived and took over electric vehicles, solar storage, robotics, and off-grid living in record time.

Today, LiFePO4 is the clear winner for 90 % of modern applications — but AGM is still the smarter and cheaper choice in specific situations. Here’s your complete, no-fluff 2025 guide.

1. What Is a LiFePO4 (LFP) Battery?

A LiFePO₄ battery uses:

  • Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO₄) as the cathode
  • Graphite (carbon) as the anode

Cell voltage: 3.2 V nominal · Full charge: 3.6–3.65 V Thanks to extreme chemical stability, virtually zero thermal-runaway risk, and 3,000–7,000+ real-world cycles, LFP is now the go-to for electric vehicles, solar storage systems, robotics, industrial machines, and any deep-cycle application.


2. What Is an AGM Battery? When AGM Is Still the Better Choice in 2025

AGM is still the better choice when:

  1. The battery spends 99 % of its life on standby/float (UPS, alarms, emergency lighting)
  2. You need reliable performance down to –40 °C / –40 °F
  3. You want zero fire/explosion risk and the simplest possible system
  4. Deep cycling is rare (weekend RV or boat use)

Main drawbacks vs LFP:

  • ~15 % charging losses
  • Limited to 50–70 % DoD for decent lifespan
  • Higher self-discharge (1–3 % per month vs ≤1 % for LFP)

3. LiFePO4 vs AGM – Full Comparison Table (2025 Data)

FeatureLiFePO4 (LFP)AGM Lead-Acid
Energy Density90–180 Wh/kg (2.5–3.5× higher)50–70 Wh/kg
Cycle Life (80–100 % DoD)3,000–7,000+ cycles300–800 cycles
Usable Depth of Discharge80–100 % daily50–70 % recommended
Charging Time1–3 hours6–12+ hours
Charge Efficiency98–99 %85–90 %
Cold PerformanceReduced below 0 °C (heater recommended)Excellent to –40 °C
Weight (same usable capacity)1/2 to 1/3 of AGMVery heavy
Self-Discharge≤1 % per month1–3 % per month
SafetyExtremely safeExtremely safe
Upfront Cost2–4× higherLowest
Cost per Cycle (long-term)Much lowerMuch higher

4. Winner by Application – 2025 Quick Reference Table

ApplicationWinnerWhy
Solar & Off-Grid StorageLiFePO4Longer life, 100 % DoD, lighter
Full-Time RV / Van LifeLiFePO4Weight savings + daily cycling
Weekend RV / MarineAGM or LiFePO4AGM wins on budget
Marine House Bank (heavy use)LiFePO4Weight & space matter on boats
UPS / Backup / Alarm SystemsAGMLives on float, cold-proof, cheap
Extreme Cold (regularly < –20 °C)AGMNo low-temp cutoff problems
Car / Boat Starting BatteryAGMBest CCA & lowest price
Forklifts / Robotics / Floor MachinesLiFePO4Survives thousands of cycles

5. Pros & Cons – At a Glance

LiFePO4 Pros

  • 3× energy density · 6–15× longer life · 100 % usable capacity · Fast charging · Ultra-low self-discharge

LiFePO4 Cons

  • Higher upfront cost · Needs low-temp protection in extreme cold

AGM Pros

  • Lowest price · Best cold-cranking & extreme-cold performance · Perfect for standby/float · No BMS complexity

AGM Cons

  • Heavy & bulky · Only 50–70 % usable · Dies fast with daily deep cycling · 15 %+ charging losses

6. Final Verdict – What Should You Actually Buy in 2025?

Buy LiFePO4 if you want the best long-term value for: solar/off-grid, full-time RV or marine house banks, electric vehicles, robotics, or any daily deep-cycle use.

Buy AGM if:

  • Budget is king and you rarely deep-cycle
  • You live/operate in extreme cold without wanting heaters
  • The battery will sit on standby 99 % of the time (UPS, security, starting batteries)

Your real-world usage pattern — not just what’s newer or “greener” — is still the #1 deciding factor. Choose the right tool for the job, and either battery will serve you perfectly for years.

Ready to upgrade? Check current prices for 12V 100Ah LiFePO4 or AGM batteries and see the difference yourself.

Related Articles